University of Texas at Austin
Libraries Home | Mobile | My Account | Renew Items | Sitemap | Help |
support us

University of Texas Libraries

University of Texas Libraries
Celebrating the Life

About the Collections

Collection Policies
Endowments and Gifts
Scholarly Communication
Protecting Intellectual Property

Collection Contacts

Subject Specialist Directory

Susan Macicak,
Collection Development Officer

Merry Burlingham,
Chief Bibliographer

Carolyn Cunningham,
Collection Administration Librarian

Mary Rader,
Global Studies Coordinator

Dale Correa,
Middle Eastern Studies Librarian

Bonnie Brown Real,
Collection and Consortia Assessment Coordinator

Lexie Thompson Young,
UT System Licensing Coordinator

Emilie Algenio,
Consortia Resources Coordinator

Lisa Aguilar,
Library Specialist

Attachment 1: Preservation and Collection Management Guidelines

General Assumptions:

  1. Materials undergoing preservation review have been identified as they were returned through circulation.
  2. Materials for review are either brittle and/or beyond the kind of physical treatment that can be justified for general collections materials.
  3. An option (see below) must be selected for each of the items reviewed.
  4. If acceptable replacements for reviewed items are available for purchase, they should be the preferred option over reformatting.
  5. All options below, with the exception of "Retain - Protective Enclosure," assume the original item will be withdrawn at the end of the process.
  6. The physical condition of other extant collection copies and editions and additional volumes in a set will be examined for all volumes undergoing the review process.
  7. All items will undergo initial review by Research Servicies Division (for PCL collection items) or by branch librarians. In many cases, preservation decisions will be made during the initial review. Monographs initially reviewed by Research Servicies Division will be referred (with recommendations) to a subject bibliographer for further review include one or more of the following criteria:

    • Imprint date older than ten years
    • Replacement is not possible
    • Value to the collection or region is in question
    • Circulation or use low

All serials will be reviewed by the subject bibliographer. Due to the complex issues surrounding serials, a framework of review for individual titles is being developed.

Summary of Preservation and Collection Mangement Options:

This may be selected for any item reviewed. Other copies and editions in poor condition should also be withdrawn. Withdrawal may be considered when an item is no longer significant to the collection, when other copies of the item are available in the collection and are in good condition or, in some cases, when the item is widely held in AMIGOS region institutions.

Transfer may be considered when the item would be more appropriately placed in another University of Texas Libraries (See Policies Materials Requiring Special Protection: #1 and Transfer of Materials Between Library Units #14). If use is not anticipated to be high, an item may be transferred to the Library Storage Facility. Other options include returning the item to the shelf with a limited circulation status or cataloging it for the PCL sixth floor stack enclosure with a "Building Use Only" circulation status (See also "Return to Shelf as is").

If a replacement in good condition can be purchased, it should always be selected over reformatting an item. No micro-opaques, microprint copies or other obsolete formats will be purchased. When there are numerous replacement choices available, the preferred format should be indicated (either paper or microform).

A paper replacement is usually in the form of a preservation photocopy. An alternative may be a paper copy made from a microform. Whenever UMI is listed as a replacement source, one should assume that a copyflo (paper made from a microfilm master) can be obtained.

The advantage of an item reformatted in paper is ease of use. The disadvantage of the format is the need to recopy the item each time another copy is requested. Paper format is most appropriate for heavily used works, standard fiction, items used as quick reference, items which may circulate often, and small pamphlets.

A 35mm microfilm copy can be made. The advantages of microfilm are its efficient use of storage space and the ease which it can be copied and distributed to other institutions. The main disadvantage is that film must be read using a reading machine. Microfilm is most appropriate for low use items, materials consulted for historical purposes and for longer works such as multi-volume sets and serials.

[Guidelines forthcoming]

This can be a phase or tuxedo box, custom made for each item. The advantage is they provide protection and support that will help a fragile item sit on shelving without incurring additional damage. The disadvantage is that a box does not in any way make a fragile item more usable; fragile items remain vulnerable while in use and as they circulate. Therefore, this option should be chosen only in cases when an item is artifactually valuable (See Policy #1), or in cases where replacement or reformatting options are prohibitively expensive.

In rare cases it may be acceptable to return a brittle/irreparable item to the shelf without intervention. The following are examples of such cases:

  • The cost of replacement or reformatting is prohibitively expensive
  • An item is artifactually valuable and the reformatting process will damage the item (confer with Jennifer Lee )

For an item to be reshelved in its damaged condition it must be able to circulate on a limited basis. The item may require a protective enclosure.

Return to Collection Policies